I thought this
piece in the Post was interesting. It struck me, however, that the author (and the Washington Post), was a bit elitist about the whole thing. I confess, I would never have stopped to hear the guy. Specifically, I would have been the guy with the iPod saying "violinist, what violinist?"
But even if I didn't have my iPod on, I don't think I would've stopped. Personally, I never really "got" classical music. It's nice, I like some pieces, but at the end of the day, I'm never going to run out and purchase an album. In fact, I wouldn't be able to tell that a world class musician is playing an incredibly difficult piece of music, even if I went to Carnegie Hall. As long as it's fairly proficient, it all sounds good to me. Maybe that means I have no ear for music. But I get the feeling that a whole bunch of old white dudes are really invested in convincing us that there is something inherently transformative and beautiful about classical music. It's the same Eurocentric bullshit we've been fed our entire lives. I'm not saying the music is bad; just that whether you like it or not may be about history, culture, and taste as much as anything inherent in the music. I'd probably find a
raga more compelling than a piece of classical music. But I don't expect the rest of the world to necessarily understand.
That being said, I get the author's larger point -- that we should stop and enjoy life more often. I'd like to, but I'm too busy being the right's poster boy for the decline of western civilization. Really guys, maybe you should take a look at Britney Spears instead of me.